Pouteria Blog

Sunday, September 13 2026

Blue Loop, Pulse 2 for Season 2026, September 2026

On 13 September 2026 T baited Blue Loop.  

100 percent of bait had been taken, but mouse poo was found in a number of stations.

Blue Loop track needs an asparagus spray.

Author MF

Published Sunday, September 13 2026, 09:05

Category Baiting

Saturday, September 12 2026

Wetland 1 - An Unofficial Photo Point - September 2026

Wetland 1 was looking good today, 13 September 2026, apart from the pampas that has sprung up! See photo.

 

Author MF

Published Saturday, September 12 2026, 10:10

Category Photo Points

Orange Loop, Pulse 2 for Season 2026, September 2026

Today, on a grey overcast day, M and T baited Orange Loop and undertook auditing and manual control en route.

Conditions underfoot were a mixed bag: very wet and squishy in some places and surprisingly dry in others. 

Surprisingly not many new trees were down, other than a big tairire between A300 and A350. See photo

100percent of baits from the previous pulse had been taken.

Enroute we controlled all moth we spotted, pleasingly few apart from 3 large moth spotted up in trees in polygon R below the Council Track. We also controlled tobacco, with many controlled in Wetland 1 and on the lower side of grasslands on Exit Ridge. Four pampas have sprung up in Wetland 1. See photo.

Most of A line forward towards the coast could do with a spray run, particularly between A400 and A350.

We saw tui, wood pigeon and fantails and heard weka and morepork (morepork heard behind A600).

We spotted 3 TKOW trail cameras: near A700, A500 and between A850 and A900.

We also spotted dog poo on Exit Ridge but it was not fresh. See photo.

Bush lawyer is in flower. See photo.

 

Author MF

Published Saturday, September 12 2026, 09:39

Category Baiting

Tags

Tuesday, September 8 2026

Upper Pink Loop, Pulse 2 for Season 2026, September 2026 - inducting new volunteers

Today M and T completed the Upper Pink Loop with new volunteers S and V. This was a bit of a refresher for M and T as well, as JL and F have been baiting this loop for quite some time.

M completely failed  to take a group selfie or even a photo of the new volunteers but we did find this photo of S and V to insert here for now.

Photo?

Conditions were good underfoot. The path was reasonably clear with only a small number of windfall trees needing clearing - one 4m lancewood was rescued from under windfall trees, most of its roit structure was intact and it just needed propping up, hopefully it should survive, it got flagged so it can be checked on during the next pulse.

Photo?

The following photo captures how amazing nature can be when dealing with obstacles inserted into the bush by humans.

Photo?

Like Yellow Loop last week, all bait stations had been cleaned out. Some had quite a lot of mouse poo in them.

Weka, fantails and wood pigeon either seen or heard.

No moth plant vines were spotted.

A privet tree (previously spotted from Orapiu Road in tge upper canopy) was found and double pink flagged for future ringbarking below d1000.

There's still plenty of garden escapees (blue morning glory, mont brevia and agapathus) around d1150 that need controlling.

Quite a field of juvi tobacco had appeared at the top of Te Matuku Ngai Tai Reserve (near f00) which we grubbed.

Patches of asparagas (round d950 through to d1100 and around c1600), gorse and pampas (c1600) persist, mainly to the North of the boundary with Ngai Tai in an area that has had the least amount of work so far but, overall, the Reserve was looking way better than it has previously. 

New volunteers, S and V, indicated, at the end of the Loop, that they are happy to take on Pink Upper Loop going forward. Yay!

 

Author MF

Published Tuesday, September 8 2026, 07:03

Category Baiting

Tags

Saturday, September 5 2026

Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Claims Settlement Act 2018 and Ngati Paoa Claims Settlement Act 2025 - relevance to Te Matuku environs

Each Settlement Act broadly defines the relevant Iwi's  "area of interest". An "area of interest" is a broad geographical area generally defining the historical / customary area associated with the relevant Iwi.

Ngai Tai ki Tamaki and Ngati Paoa's "areas of interest" both overlap at Waiheke.

At a broad rohe level, Te Matuku environs is within the statutory recognised "areas of interest" of both Ngai Tai ki Tamaki and Ngati Paoa.

https://www.tkm.govt.nz/iwi/ngai-tai-ki-tamaki/

https://www.tkm.govt.nz/iwi/ngati-paoa/

But, wait, there's more ...  both Settlement Acts separately give "statutory acknowledgement" over Te Matuku Bay Scenic Reserve to each Iwi (Ngai Tai ki Tamaki: OTS-403-121 and Ngati Paoa: OTS-403-266).

Interestingly the areas over which both Iwi have "statutory acknowledgement" appear to be identical and are the boundaries of the DoC administered Reserve, prior to any treaty settlements.

The Act expressly states that a "statutory acknowledgement" does not have the effect of granting, creating or providing evidence of an estate or interest in, or rights relating to, the statutory area. What a "statutory acknowledgement" does do, however, is give Iwi a stronger formal voice in decisions concerning the area, particularly where resource management processes are involved.

But, wait, there's more ... the Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Settlement Act gifted 2.002hectares of Te Matuku Bay Scenic Reserve to Ngai Tai ki Tamaki - the area gifted is to remain a Reserve but was vested in Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Trustees and thereafter to be called Te Matuku Ngai Tai Scenic Reserve.

From our investigations (and we could be wrong) it appears that both Iwi "statutory acknowledgements" cover the whole of the original DoC administered Reserve. The gifting of an area of the Reserve to Ngai Tai ki Tamaki does not appear to have removed that area from Ngati Paoa's area of "statutory acknowledgement".

In practise the impact of the "statutory acknowledgeent" over Te Matuku Bay Scenic Reserve and Te Matuku Ngai Tai Reserve will be minimal, as it is unlikely that any resource consent applications will be made in respect of land covered by the Reserve. But never say never - given the changes that were proposed to the Conservation Act earlier this year (2026), which indicated some conservation land could be sold off and other subject to commercialisation. Now, both Iwi will have a say were sale or commercialisation of the Te Matuku Reserves ever to become a real possibility.

 

Author MF

Published Saturday, September 5 2026, 10:16

Category Misc

Tags

Kaka and weka on Waiheke - a look back 20 plus years

We have lived at the Bottom End for around 26 years.

In our first year in Omaru Bay I was on the phone with someone working in conservation who told me there were no weka on Waiheke. I had my NZ illustrated bird book on my lap at the time open at the weka page and the bird on our front lawn, less than 2m away from me through the glass, looked exactly like the weka illustration in the book. Since there "were no weka on Waiheke" it must have been a figment of my immagination!  Not long after, I visited Stoney Batter and saw more weka near the museum / tunnel entrance.

Just recently I was again speaking with someone working in conservation who mentioned that kaka had only recently started to successfully nest on Waiheke (as a result of the successful stoat erradication programme run by Te Korowhi O Waiheke) and kaka numbers on Waiheke are up over 900 percent. I was rather surprised by this information as kaka and kaka fledglings have been sighted in Te Matuku Bay Scenic Reserve (and photographed on 1 January 2020 - see blog post of that date) and in many (most?) years past kaka have nested in Omaru Bay. We used to see big flocks flying together around Omaru Bay (24 on one occasion). In more recent years the most we have seen flying together around Omaru Bay is 14. Potentially, as a result of fewer predators, kaka have dispursed more widely across the island, but, equally, potentially Vector destroyed one of the main kaka nesting sites in Omaru Bay in February 2024.  Vector felled (by cutting off at base) some huge pines in February 2024. For about 10 days after the trees were felled the kaka circled the area where the trees had stood, very stressed and discombobulated. It was a sad sight to see. There does seem to be another kaka nesting site in the bay and there's certainly plenty of evidence of kaka tree destruction - this year the huge Redwood in Omaru Bay has been a favorite feeding spot and it is currently suffering with much bark removed.

Author MF

Published Saturday, September 5 2026, 09:28

Category Birds

Tags

Yellow Loop, Pulse 2 for Season 2026, September 2026

Today T and I baited Yellow Loop (but we forgot our GPS). The sun  was shining, but we have had rain recently, so the conditions underfoot were slippery. At the base of greywaeke valley the stream was running into the small pond - see photo below.

100% percent of baits from the prior pulse had been taken, mouse poo was found in two stations.

We heard tui and weka nearby and were visited by fantails on our way around.

No moth plant were spotted in the hotspots en route - that bodes well.

Author MF

Published Saturday, September 5 2026, 09:19

Category Baiting

Tags

Winter blues? Nature's "pick me up" .... clematis in bloom

At the end of Winter (August in NZ) when the weather, and other things might get one down, nature provides a pick me up in the form of Clematis vines in flower. Right now Omaru Bay and Te Matuku Bay are dotted with white flowers, high in the canopy. When the wind blows petals rain down onto the forest floor.

See images below.

 

 

Author MF

Published Saturday, September 5 2026, 09:09

Category Botanics

Tuesday, September 1 2026

Moth plant pod collection count - end of season 2026 and a potted history from when we started

It makes zero sense to look at moth plant control on a calendar or financial year end annual basis, given moth plant seedlings sprout in spring and dry, burst open and spread in summer. So, we look at moth plant pod collection on a seasonal basis from 1 September to 31 August. 

In the season prior to our records starting Auckland Council Contractors collected tonnes (by weight) of pods from Te Matuku Bay Scenic Reserve ("encouraged" to do so by an Environment Court action taken against Auckland Council by locals irritated by moth plant spreading from local reserves in public ownership (Auckland Council and DoC) into the locals' properties). Volunteers went in after the Contractors and collected hundreds of, and possibly over a 1000, pods missed by the Contractors. Volunteers didn't count the pods they collected in that initial season because it was onerous enough just collecting them!

In each season since, the volunteers' strategy has been to control moth plant prior to pods forming, so as to minimise pod collection.

In each successive season the number of moth plant pods found (and we look very hard to find them) and collected has fallen. See chart below.  And the number of locations they have been found in has also dropped to low levels. 

From many 1000s of pods collected six seasons ago to 22 pods collected in the season ending 31 August 2026 - from 200 acres of public land. Not bad at all. Competent contractors employing effective methodology, good strategic planning, good infrastructure, committed volunteers - together getting the job done!

Of course, one rogue vine, may, in future, ruin our record but we will continue being vigilant! Unless, of course, Auckland Council removes the moth plant control rule - in which case we'll all just probably give up and go fishing!

Total pods collected

 # of locations pods found

Season

 

Notes

22

4

2026

 

13 on one vine

56

5

2025

 

46 on one vine

64

4

2024

   

74

3

2023

   

149

13

2022

   

Season is 1 September to 31 August across a calendar year end

   

 

 

Author MF

Published Tuesday, September 1 2026, 05:07

Category Manual

Tags

Sunday, August 30 2026

Orapiu Road, under road culvert - an on-going saga with the potential to be exacerbated by a proposed new fill site.

The Culvert Saga - flooding

Just north of 530 Orapiu Road is a large under road culvert, meant to convey storm water from the valley to the East into the sea at the head of Te Matuku bay.

When F and A owned 530 Orapiu Road (according to A) they advised Auckland Council that the culvert was inadequate in severe weather events and on occasions water over-ran the road.  Some time later Auckland Council contractors turned up with two culvert pipes and proceeded to dig up the under road culvert. The existing culvert pipe (42inch diameter) was replaced with another culvert pipe (1m in diameter). A commented that, with Auckland Council contractors turning up with two culvert pipes, they thought that the existing pipe was going to be replaced by two pipes and that would likely have solved the problem, but that did not occur. What actually occurred was a larger diameter (imperial measure) pipe was replaced by a smaller diameter (metric measure) pipe (C took the measurements and photos and if he can find them in his records this post will be annotated with those in due course). Replacing a larger diameter pipe with a smaller diameter pipe only exacerbated the flooding problem. In addition, the replacement of the old pipe destabilished the earth around the pipe and in each of the next two flooding events the tarseal on the East (upper) side of Orapiu Road was damaged and washed away due to the force of the flood waters. This necessitated Auckland Council contractors repairing the road side and surface. On a subsequent occasion, when this happened again, Auckland Council contractors concreted rocks along the road sides around and on either sides of the culvert entry on both the East and West sides of Orapiu Road. 

Around that time M commissioned an engineer (L) to calculate the difference in volume through put of the smaller diameter pipe versus the prior marginally larger diameter pipe - and the volume throughput differential was significant at 217litres per second at full volume.

M presented this information to the Local Board and requested the Board rectify the issue or, at a minimum, the Local Board had a Health and Safety obligation, to install warning signs indicating the road floods periodically, alongside depth indicators showing the depth of flood waters. (M is likely to have records of this presentation in her files in deep filing and if/when she finds that information this post will be annotated in due course).

Nothing happened.

On the occasion of at least one flooding event a person tried to drive through the flood waters and ran into difficulty with their car washed aside by the power of the flood waters.

M subsequently contacted Auckland Transport and was told by an Auckland Transport Officer that the road there was "designed to flood". Clearly this statement was nonsense. Had the road been "designed to flood" the road sides would have been stabilised with rocks and flooding signs and depth indicators would have been installed from the outset.

M persisted. This time writing to the Local Board pointing out the Health and Safety risk posed by a road that floods without warning signs or depth indicators. M made sure the Local Board unsderstood that, having been made aware of the risk, the risk lay with them should any fatality or loss occur. (M is likely to have records of this communication in her files in deep filing and if/when she finds that information this post will be annotated in due course).

Nothing happened.

M persisted. This time writing to DD of AC. (M is likely to have records of this communication in her files in deep filing and if/when she finds that information this post will be annotated in due course).

Amazingly - after around 15 years of trying  (and likely  thanks to action by DD) - in early 2025 flooding signs and depth indicators suddenly appeared.

https://pouteria.org.nz/blog/index.php?post/2025/04/21/Subject-to-Flooding

Since the culvert pipe was changed M estimates there have been at least 8 occasions when the road has flooded.

A Potential Fill Site - a disaster waiting to happen

The Te Matuku Marine Reserve actually spans the area on both the East and West side of the culvert. On the Eastern edge of the Marine Reserve on the East side of the culvert is an area of Esplanade Reserve and wetland.  On a property, immediately adjacent to the Esplanade Reserve, a new fill site is proposed. See map and photos below.

Consenting such a fill site at this location, given the following information, would be reprehensible.

Overall Te Matuku Bay is the highest value ecological asset on Waiheke Island.  It is unmatched locally in its comprehensive structural complexity and ecological health. It is the island's largest and least disturbed estuary, its best complete estuarine to forest vegetation sequence and its most critical wading bird habitat.  The three highest ranked wetlands on the Island are found in the bay (ranked by Bennett for Auckland Council in 2012).  Te Matuku dominates the island ecological hierarchy  because of its uninterrupted environmental continuity.  Other areas on Waiheke are highly fragmented by urban development or farming but Te Matuku provides an intact seamless transition from deep water channels  to intertidal mudflats, saltwater mangroves, freshwater raupo wetlands and mature kauri and tanekaha forest.

Within greater Auckland Te Matuku stands out regionally because its marine catchment remains extraordinarily clean and undisturbed by urban stormwater with the result being a rare example of unpolluted unbroken marine-to-terrestrial ecology which sees the bay being a sanctuary stronghold for resilient spiny tubeworm colonies.

On a national scale, Te Matuku holds elite status due to its Marine Reserve and Area of Significant Conservation Value designation, which it has because it acts as a critical international hub for migratory birds (such as the bar-tailed godwit flying in from Alaska) and an essential breeding ground for the endangered New Zealand dotterel. Te Matuku is on a par with the country's most significant coastal sanctuaries.

 

 

 

 

Author MF

Published Sunday, August 30 2026, 05:57

Category Misc

Tags